Impeachment: Fayose knows fate soon (Thisday)

 The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja monday fixed May 21 for hearing in the suit filed by seven Peoples Democratic Party  (PDP) lawmakers in the Ekiti State House of Assembly seeking to set aside all the actions of the All Progressives Congress (APC)  lawmakers including plans to impeach Governor Ayodele Fayose and his deputy, Kolapo Olusola.
The judge, Justice Evoh Chukwu, had on April 23, 2015, made an ex parte order directing Ominrin and the 22 other defendants in the suit to appear in court to show cause why the court should not grant an order of interim injunction restraining them from going ahead with the plan to remove the governor and his deputy, Kolapo Olusola.
 The judge also ordered the parties to maintain the status quo.
The judge equally ordered the plaintiffs to issue and serve the originating summons and all other  processes in the suit on the defendants in the state outside the jurisdiction of the court.
The judge further granted leave to the plaintiffs/applicants to serve the originating summons and all other processes in this suit on the 2nd - 21st defendants by substituted means by advertising same in the newspaper.
“That the service of the originating summons and all other processes in this suit on the 2nd to 21st defendants are deemed as proper service.
“That on the application of plaintiffs/applicants’ counsel time is hereby abridged to seven days within which the respondents are to file their processes i.e counter affidavit and written address if any from the date of the publication in the newspaper”.
The plaintiffs in the suit also asked the court to restrain the Clerk of the state House of Assembly ( the 21st defendant in the suit) from further according legislative privileges to the APC lawmakers in view of their continuous absence from meetings and legislative business of the state  House of Assembly, pending the determination of the Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Dele Olugbemi Joseph, Ajibola Samuel Oyedele, Israel Olowo, Alex Ade Ojo, Adeyinka Adeloye, Adesope Olayinka and  Ayoka Fatunmbi had approached the court through their counsel, Ahmed  Raji (SAN) seeking an order to set aside all actions and activities taken by the APC lawmakers.
Listed as defendants are the  Inspector General of Police, Speaker of the Ekiti House of Assembly, Dr. Adewale Omirin and 18 APC lawmakers.
The court had at the last adjourned date while ruling on an ex-parte application brought by the  plaintiffs, ordered the APC members in Ekiti House of Assembly to maintain the status quo in their  bid to impeach Fayose.
After  the order, the judge summoned them to come and show cause why he should not declare their seat vacant and also set aside all the actions taken so far with respect to the impeachment of Fayose.
The court had fixed yesterday for the hearing of the motion on notice.
 At the resumed hearing of the suit yesterday, Raji informed the court that defendants had not filed any application as ordered by the court, showing why their (plaintiffs) reliefs against the defendants should not be granted.
He, however, urged the court to grant all their prayers setting aside all the actions of the APC lawmakers.
 Counsel to the defendants, Terence Vember raised an application challenging the jurisdiction of the  court to hear the matter in the first place.
He told the court that he did not file any application because he is opposing the plaintiffs’ application.
 He argued that the law permitted him to argue orally because the motion on notice filed by the plaintiffs was in default, having not sought the leave of court before filing it.
Justice Chukwu however ordered the defendants to file their submission in writing